Very rarely do you walk out pleased from a cinema hall after watching a movie
that's based on one of your favorite books.
Kite Runner - the movie was a similar experience.
The story incomplete, the intensity not as strong, the image very different from what the book
creates, the essence, not completely conveyed....
A friend of mine who
hadn't read the book says after the movie, 'its about how
Amir gets over his shame...' Am glad the movie could convey that to him. As someone who loved the book it was very hard for me to look beyond whats missed out and still capture the
essence of the movie from what was shown.
Kabul of the 70s, the bustling streets, the excitement of the Kite Flying tournament is created just as I had imagined after reading the book. The image of Amir's house was much more modern than what the picture in my mind. The characters of Amir's father and
Hassan have been completely brought to life. However, war struck Afghanistan, the terror and
devastation,
Asef's terrifying character, the torture and torment, are much stronger in the book.
Yes, the movie is just 'based' on the book and
doesnt have to be exactly the same, but the movie leaves out half the book.... May be its
ok to do that... but not at the cost of losing the Strength of the Story...
The movie though truly belonged to the kid who plays
Hassan - He is just like what I imagined and SO much MORE....
Don't you think movies based on books are successful only when they have the capacity to take the fiction one step further, distract the viewer from the book a little... and still convey the essence in its entirety? Maybe, a certain level of abstraction can succeed in doing that but not simply omitting or changing parts of the story from the book. (one such example the was a great book and then an incredible movie in the recent past : the Namesake)